Neuspiel
DR.
Racism and perinatal addiction.
Ethn Dis 1996;6(1-2):47-55.
Epidemiologic surveys have been contradictory in reporting ethnic differences
in substance use. In a probability sampling of all women who gave birth
in California in 1992, African American women had the highest prevalence
of total drug, alcohol, cocaine, and tobacco use (Vega, 1993). However,
most drug exposures during pregnancy were among non-Hispanic white and
Hispanic women. The National Household Survey on Drug Abuse in 1991 reported
that 62% of cocaine users and 50% of crack users were white. Furthermore,
the 1991 Youth Risk Behavior Survey ascertained that white and Hispanic
students reported more alcohol and cocaine use than their African American
counterparts. While most national surveys either report little ethnic
variation in drug use or lower rates among African Americans, medical
and criminal justice systems show significantly larger effects of drugs
among non-whites, with African Americans having the highest drug-related
morbidity and mortality. Although racial disparity in drug use continues
in our society, this article focuses on the racial disparity existing
in our policies that target non-white pregnant women and mothers and the
consequences of the disparity.
A study conducted in 1989 among 715 pregnant women enrolled in prenatal
care in Florida demonstrates the existence of racial reporting bias. The
rates of illicit drug detection were similar among women seen in public
clinic or private offices. Black women had more frequent evidence of cocaine
use compared with the white women (7.5% vs. 1.8%), while whites had more
numerous evidence of marijuana than the black women (14% vs. 6%) did.
However, in Florida, both cocaine and marijuana detection during delivery
legally compels reporting. Despite similar levels of illicit drug use
among black and white women, black women were 10 times more likely to
be reported to the authority than white women were and poor women were
also more likely to reported. Thus, legally mandated reporting of drug
use during pregnancy appears to vary by ethnicity and socioeconomic status.
Social factors may bias screening procedures for newborn urine toxicology
and reporting of the findings. These factors include the obvious lack
of prenatal care, discretion of the hospital staff, and willingness of
private physicians to perform the screening. Physicians at a hospital
in South Carolina were accused of testing pregnant women, mostly African
Americans, for drug use without consent (Hilts, 1994). Many women as a
result were persecuted of the drug testing. Drug use may be perpetuated
due to the insufficiency of drug treatment resources. The inadequate availability
of prenatal care and substance treatment programs for pregnant women,
particularly the poor, may further contribute to drug use among pregnant
women. Regardless of lack of treatment resources, the numbers of minority
women persecuted for drug use during pregnancy are escalating. The fear
of persecution and the removal of their children may prevent high-risk
women from seeking the necessary prenatal care.
The author believes that our current drug policy that targets minority
women for illicit drug use during pregnancy diverts attention from the
social ills confronting our society, such as high rates of infant mortality,
particularly among blacks. Our economic and social abandonment directs
minorities to seek out drugs. Furthermore, the media stereotyping of minorities
as drug users perpetrates both despair and drug use among them. Thus,
the author states that we should aim to "offer free treatment on
demand to all addictions as part of universal health care, with special
programs serving the need of women and mother" and also reduce criminal
persecution for drug use. A major contention of the article is that there
is very little data available on the adverse biological consequences of
prenatal cocaine exposure. Furthermore, the author continues with the
statement that "attributing childhood problems to the individual
behavior of their drug using mothers appears to be more politically expedient
than examining and remediating the social factors that lead to family
dysfunction, persistent untreated addiction, and pervasive poverty."
However, underestimating the health consequences of prenatal drug use
does not serve to decriminalize drug use during pregnancy, but ignores
the significant problem of drug afflicted infants.