Ozminkowski
RJ, White AJ, Hassol A, Murphy M.
What if socioeconomics made no difference? Access to cadaver kidney
transplant as an example.
Med Care 1998;36(9):1398-406.
This article describes a simulation study that attempted to estimate
the effect of socioeconomic status on access to a cadaver kidney transplant
after controlling for self-reported health/functional status and attitudes
about treatment alternatives (which are likely to confound the association
between socioeconomic status and access to treatment).
The authors demonstrate that if socioeconomic status by itself no longer
influenced rates (that is, if the effect of socioeconomic status were
removed), race, age, and income level differences in kidney transplant
waiting lists and transplants would diminish. With regard to race specifically,
the difference in waiting list entry rates for black patients versus more
advantaged persons decreased from 93/1,000 patients to 39/1,000 patients.
Additionally, under the same scenario, the race difference in transplant
rates diminished from 236/1,000 patients to 177/1,000 patients.
The authors conclude that socioeconomic status itself is an important
contributor to race, age and income differences, rather than a proxy measure
for group differences in heath/functional status or attitudes toward treatment.