Med
Care 1998 Sep;36(9):1398-406
What if socioeconomics made no difference?: access to a cadaver kidney
transplant as an example.
Ozminkowski RJ, White AJ, Hassol A, Murphy M.
MEDSTAT Group, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA.
OBJECTIVES: Several studies have noted the impact of
socioeconomic factors on access to expensive medical care, but none of
those studies controlled for self-reported health and functional status
or attitudes about treatment alternatives when analyses were completed.
Because these factors may be correlated with socioeconomic status, the
failure to control for them may have led to bias in other studies. The
authors merged data from secondary sources with telephone survey data
from a national sample of 456 end-stage renal disease patients to show
how estimates of the effects of socioeconomic factors change when self-reported
health and functional status and attitudes about treatment are incorporated
into statistical models. The authors also showed how kidney transplant
rates would change if socioeconomic factors no longer influences organ
allocation decisions.
METHODS: Weibull proportional hazard analyses were used
to show relationships between socioeconomic measures and waiting list
entry and kidney transplant rates, before versus after accounting for
self-reported health and functional status, attitudes about treatment,
and other variables. Simulation analyses were used to estimate the number
of waiting list spots and transplant operations that would move from economically
advantaged to disadvantaged persons if socioeconomics no longer influenced
organ allocation decisions.
RESULTS: Incorporating information about health and functional
status, attitudes about treatment, and other factors into the hazard models
often reduced the estimated impact of socioeconomic measures on the odds
of (1) being on a waiting list for a cadaver kidney transplant and (2)
receiving a transplant. Simulations showed that 30 to 65 waiting list
spots or transplant operations per 1,000 patients would shift from economically
advantaged to disadvantaged persons if socioeconomics no longer influenced
organ allocation decisions.
CONCLUSIONS: Successful efforts to level the playing
field would result in substantial redistributions of kidney transplants
from economically advantaged to disadvantaged persons.
PMID: 9749662 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]