N
Engl J Med 2000 Nov 23;343(21):1537-44, 2 p preceding
1537
Racial disparities in access to renal transplantation--clinically appropriate
or due to underuse or overuse?
Epstein AM, Ayanian JZ, Keogh JH, Noonan SJ, Armistead N, Cleary PD, Weissman
JS, David-Kasdan JA, Carlson D, Fuller J, Marsh D, Conti RM.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public
Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA. aepstein@hsph.harvard.edu
BACKGROUND: Despite abundant evidence of racial disparities
in the use of surgical procedures, it is uncertain whether these disparities
reflect racial differences in clinical appropriateness or overuse or underuse
of inappropriate care.
METHODS: We performed a literature review and used an
expert panel to develop criteria for determining the appropriateness of
renal transplantation for patients with end-stage renal disease. Using
data from five states and the District of Columbia on patients who had
started to undergo dialysis in 1996 or 1997, we selected a random sample
of 1518 patients (age range, 18 to 54 years), stratified according to
race and sex. We classified the appropriateness of patients as data on
candidates for transplantation and analyzed rates of referral to a transplantation
center for evaluation, placement on a waiting list, and receipt of a transplant
according to race.
RESULTS: Black patients were less likely than white patients
to be rated as appropriate candidates for transplantation according to
appropriateness criteria based on expert opinion (71 blacks [9.0 percent]
vs. 152 whites [20.9 percent]) and were more likely to have had incomplete
evaluations (368 [46.5 percent] vs. 282 [38.8 percent], P<0.001 for
the overall chi-square). Among patients considered to be appropriate candidates
for transplantation, blacks were less likely than whites to be referred
for evaluation, according to the chart review (90.1 percent vs. 98.0 percent,
P=0.008), to be placed on a waiting list (71.0 percent vs. 86.7 percent,
P=0.007), or to undergo transplantation (16.9 percent vs. 52.0 percent,
P<0.001). Among patients classified as inappropriate candidates, whites
were more likely than blacks to be referred for evaluation (57.8 percent
vs. 38.4 percent), to be placed on a waiting list (30.9 percent vs. 17.4
percent), and to undergo transplantation (10.3 percent vs. 2.2 percent,
P<0.001 for all three comparisons).
CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities in rates of renal transplantation
stem from differences in clinical characteristics that affect appropriateness
as well as from underuse of transplantation among blacks and overuse among
whites. Reducing racial disparities will require efforts to distinguish
their specific causes and the development of interventions tailored to
address them.
PMID: 11087884 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]