Chang
SW, Kerlikowske K, Napoles Springer A, Posner SF, Sickles EA, Perez Stable
EJ.
Racial differences in timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening
mammography.
Cancer 1996;78(7):1395-402.
To determine whether patient race was associated with timeliness of follow-up
after abnormal screening mammography, a retrospective record review of
diagnostic tests for women with abnormal screening mammography from a
Northern California mobile van was conducted.
The study included 317 women between 33 and 85 years of age who were reported
to have abnormal screening mammography during the period from July 1993
to May 1994.
“Median time to final disposition differed significantly (P<0.001)
by race, with medians of 12 days (range, 1 to 192) for white women and
19 days (range, 2 to 176) for nonwhite women.
Nonwhite women had significantly longer time (median time, 19 days) from
the date of index abnormal screening mammography and first diagnostic
test (median time, 15 days for nonwhite women versus 7 days for white
women, P<.0001)…The racial difference was similarly significant
for each nonwhite subgroup (African American, Latina, and Asian) when
compared with white women (P<0.01).”
“Reasons for less timely follow-up of abnormal mammography among
nonwhite women need to be identified. Delays that may be instigated by
the patient or due to her physician or system of care need to be explored
further.”
As possible explanations for the findings, the authors suggested: patient-induced
delay related to individual fears and anxieties, provider-related delay,
and poorer access to care of nonwhite women.
“A lower rate of invasive testing (i.e., biopsy) among nonwhites
in our series is consistent with reports of racial differences in the
evaluation of other disorders, namely cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular
disease. These studies have primarily focused on white versus African
American populations and have raised questions concerning potential differences
in patient preferences, insurance coverage, and discriminatory practices
among providers.”