J Am Coll Cardiol 1997 Oct;30(4):901-7
Can characteristics of a health care system mitigate ethnic bias in
access to cardiovascular procedures? Experience from the Military Health
Services System.
Taylor AJ, Meyer GS, Morse RW, Pearson CE.
Department of Medicine, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington,
DC 20307-5001, USA. ataylor@vs.wramc.amedd.army.mil
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the independent
effect of ethnicity on the utilization of invasive cardiac procedures
after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
BACKGROUND: The precise role of ethnicity in access to
cardiovascular procedures is unknown, particularly because of difficulty
in isolating ethnicity from financial and other socioeconomic factors.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of the use of cardiac catheterization
and coronary revascularization procedures after AMI in military health
care beneficiaries. The Military Health Services System (MHSS) ensures
equal access to care in an environment without financial incentives for
procedural utilization; furthermore, socioeconomic differences between
patients beyond ethnicity are minimized.
METHODS: Data were analyzed from the Civilian External
Peer Review Program representing abstracted chart reviews from 125 military
health care facilities worldwide for all patients (1,208 white; 233 nonwhite
[155 black]) with the principal or secondary diagnosis of AMI from March
to September 1993.
RESULTS: Rates of cardiac catheterization were similar
in white and nonwhite patients (34.8 vs. 39.1%, p = 0.21). After controlling
for age, gender, cardiovascular risk factors and AMI variables, including
infarct size and other risk markers, there were no differences in the
use of this procedure during the AMI admission in comparisons of white
versus nonwhite patients (estimated odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence
interval [CI] 0.69 to 1.34) and white versus black patients (OR 1.19,
95% CI 0.80 to 1.78). However, white patients were significantly more
likely than nonwhite patients to be "considered" for future
cardiac catheterization (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.61). Coronary revascularization
within 180 days was not significantly affected by race in white versus
nonwhite (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.39) and white versus black patients
(OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.89). Outcomes (30- and 180-day mortality and
readmission rates) were similar for all race groups.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a limited relation between ethnicity
and the use of invasive cardiac procedures in the MHSS. These data raise
the promise that characteristics of a health care system can mitigate
ethnic bias in medicine.
PMID: 9316516 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]