Peniston
RL, Lu DY, Papademetriou V, Fletcher RD.
Severity of coronary artery disease in black and white male veterans
and likelihood of revascularization.
Am Heart J 2000;139(5):840-7.
(Comment in: Am Heart J 2000;139(5):764-6.)
This study aimed to assess the use of revascularization procedures among
patients with cardiovascular disease in the Washington, DC metropolitan
area. This areas was chosen because the relative proportions of black
patients and white patients evaluated for coronary artery disease (CAD)
are more evenly distributed there than in other areas of the country.
All male patients admitted to a Veterans Administration hospital who
had undergone a coronary angiography procedure during the period from
November 1986 to November 1992 and were of either black or white race
were included in the study. A total of 1,460 patients were included; the
population consisted of almost equal numbers of blacks and whites (726
versus 734). Blacks typically had a higher prevalence of hypertension
and diabetes, but a lower prevalence of myocardial infarction, anginal
syndromes, and dyslipidemias. The percentage of black patients without
significant CAD was almost twice that of the white patients (37% versus
19% had no vessels involved). Of those with CAD, however, the black and
white groups had similar proportions of patients with 3-vessel and left
main disease (35% versus 37%). Blacks were less likely to be classified
by study clinicians as either "should revascularize" (24% of
blacks versus 38% of whites) or "possibly revascularize" (11%
of blacks versus 16% of whites).
Only about 60% of those who needed revascularization received it: 7%
of blacks and 9% of whites received PTCA, and 6% of blacks and 11% of
whites received CABG. Ethnicity was not a significant independent predictor
for revascularization in multivariate analyses that controlled for clinical
characteristics. When the analysis was confined to patients with significant
CAD, ethnicity was again not significantly associated with revascularization.
Additionally, the rates of revascularization did not differ by race even
when stratified by the number of diseased vessels.
However, black patients had significantly decreased survival beyond 2
to 3 years after cardiac catheterization (p<0.05). The mean survival
was 3,101 days for black patients and 3,346 days for whites. Risk of death
was associated with advancing age, ventricular function, and clinically
significant CHF. CABG (but not PTCA) was protective. The OR for mortality
for white versus black race in a multivariate analysis that included all
of these variables was 0.57 (95% confidence interval=0.43 to 0.76). These
results were similar when the sample was limited to patients with significant
CAD.
The authors conclude, "This study has confirmed that (when anatomic
and functional factors are assessed) there is not statistically significant
evidence of an ethnic or racial bias at work to explain the overall difference
in the revascularization rates of black veterans and white veterans."
With regard to the discrepancy in findings between this study and some
previous reports, the authors note that previous studies frequently had
either relatively small numbers of black patients or a lack of precise
anatomic data stratifying the degree of coronary disease. The typical
practice of substituting morbid events such as myocardial infarction and
anginal syndromes for anatomic data might be misguided, as these events
have no predictive value regarding the extent of abnormal coronary anatomy.
(Although the authors of this study acknowledge that "why such morbid
events do not prompt the routine performance of coronary angiography is
difficult to fathom without assuming some influence of provider bias or
patient preferences.") Furthermore, previous studies based on administrative
datasets may not have completely controlled for readmission rates (due
to privacy issues in these types of datasets). However, the authors note
that it is not possible to state with authority that the large black population
of this medical center makes these findings atypical in comparison to
other VA facilities.
With regard to the higher long-term mortality for blacks, the authors
state that this "is very likely reflective of a frequently cited,
society-wide phenomenon and its poorly defined and confusing explanatory
variables." They conclude that, "it is not possible from the
data presented in this study to assess the reasons that led to higher
long-term mortality rates among black patients. It can be speculated that
possible repeat procedures or even known risk factors that are more prevalent
among blacks (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, kidney failure) may have played
a role."