Pashos
CL, Newhouse JP, McNeil BJ.
Temporal changes in the care and outcomes of elderly patients with acute
myocardial infarction, 1987 through 1990.
JAMA 1993;270(15):1832-6.
Using Health Care Financing Administration data for patients hospitalized
for acute myocardial infarction, the authors evaluated 4-year trends in
survival and treatment. The 1-year mortality rates (adjusted for age and
gender) did not differ between white and black patients; however the 30-day
mortality rates did differ by race for each of the four years from 1987
to 1990. (In 1990 the adjusted 30-day RR for blacks compared with whites
was 0.87 (95% confidence interval was 0.84 to 0.91).)
Over the 4-year period, the proportion of patients who had angiography
within 90-days of their index admission increased, as did the rates of
revascularization procedures, bypass surgery, and angioplasty. While the
RR for angiography of blacks compared with whites rose very slightly during
this period (RR in 1987=0.72, 95% confidence interval=0.69 to 0.74, and
RR in 1990=0.76, 95% confidence interval=0.74 to 0.78), the rate for revascularization
procedures –coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and percutaneous
transluminal coronary angioplasty (PCTA) – remained the same. All
rates revealed that blacks received these procedures about half as frequently
as “non-blacks.”
Among patients undergoing angiography, the adjusted RR for having either
revascularization procedure rose slightly from 0.69 (95% confidence interval=0.66
to 0.73) to 0.72 (95% confidence interval=0.69 to 0.75).
No data were provided regarding racial patterns in use of drug therapy.
The overall rate of use of thrombolytic therapy rose from 4.1% to 11%,
the use of beta blockers increased from 24% to 28%, and the use of calcium
channel blockers decreased from 62% to 55% in the SMS Corporation administrate
cohort (a similar, but smaller cohort than the cohort identified through
the HCFA). However, the authors estimate that only a small part of the
decline in 30-day mortality could be explained by increased use of thrombolysis
and state that “other factors must surely be involved.” None
were tested, however.
Improvement in survival was significant regardless of gender or race.
“Although we observed continued disparities in the use of angiography
and revascularization procedures…, the survival improvements in
each demographic subgroup suggest that improvements are being made in
the care that affect all AMI patients regardless of their gender or race.”
The authors conclude, “The fact that mortality rates for blacks
and whites were similar at one-year, while revascularization procedure
rates of blacks remained at about half the rates of whites, suggests that
the increased use of invasive procedures may be relatively unimportant
with respect to mortality decline.” They do not mention other possible
confounding effects of racism.