Guadagnoli
E, Ayanian JZ, Gibbons G, McNeil BJ, LoGerfo FW.
The influence of race on the use of surgical procedures for treatment
of peripheral vascular disease of the lower extremities.
Arch Surg 1995;130(4):381-6.
After adjusting for age, gender, the number of hospitalizations during
the 12-month period prior to surgery, comorbidity, region of residence,
location and teaching status of hospital, and race by diabetes interaction,
black patients were more likely to have above knee amputation (OR=1.83;
95% confidence interval=1.73 to 1.94) and toe and/or foot amputation (OR=1.37;
95% confidence interval=1.29 to 1.46). Black patients were also less likely
to have limb-saving procedures; the OR for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty=0.39
(95% confidence interval =0.36 to 0.43) and OR for lower-extremity bypass=0.62
(95% confidence interval =0.59 to 0.65).
In the fully adjusted models, patients’ region of residence, the
location of the hospital in which they received care, and the teaching
status of the hospital all influenced the likelihood of undergoing the
surgical procedures for both black and white patients. Thus, these factors
did not explain the racial difference.
Alternate explanations offered include: unmeasured factors related to
severity of illness (such as a delay in presentation following initial
manifestations of disease, lack of access to outpatient care, less optimal
outpatient care, or patient noncompliance); difference in the expertise
of the treating hospitals (although unlikely because the availability
of necessary technologies would likely be associated with teaching hospital
status, which was controlled in this analysis); patient preferences; and
biased decision making.
“The influence of patient preferences could explain our results
only if a disproportionate number of black compared with white patients
underwent amputation following a failed…” prior procedure
(which patients might want to avoid repeating, such as a failed lower
extremity bypass).
As an alternative to biased decision-making, the authors posit that the
greater likelihood of limb sparing therapy among white patients might
be partially explained by the use of this therapy for situations when
medical therapy is appropriate. “Whether this is a viable explanation
cannot be known until we collect more detailed clinical information as
well as information on physician decision making processes.”