Goldberg
KC, Hartz AJ, Jacobsen SJ, Krakauer H, Rimm AA.
Racial and community factors influencing coronary artery bypass graft
surgery rates for all 1986 Medicare patients.
JAMA 1992;267(11):1473-7.(Comment in JAMA 1992;268(5):604)
The purpose of this study was to use a large national database to evaluate
whether racial differences in coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG)
rates varied depending on the geographic area, the need for care, and
the supply of physicians. Data for this study were derived from 1986 MEDPAR
files (for the number of coronary artery bypass graft surgeries and myocardial
infarctions), the Bureau of Health Professions area resource file, and
county population estimates from the 1985 Bureau of the Census. The population
of interest was whites and blacks over 65 years of age (Medicare eligible).
There was great geographic variation in the rate of CABG across the United
States. States in the northeast generally had low rates, and states in
the northwest and south generally had the highest rates. One quarter of
the states had (age and sex adjusted) rates of 31.0 per 10,000 or higher
and one quarter had rates of 23.2 per 10,000 or lower. The racial disparity
in rates also varied greatly by geographic location. Overall, the national
age- and sex-adjusted rate for whites was 27.1 per 10,000 in comparison
to 7.6 per 10,000 for blacks. Thus nationally, the ratio of white to black
CABG rate was 3. However, for the southeastern states, the ratio was greater
than 6, and in other areas it was much lower. Among men, the national
CABG rate was 40.4 for whites and 9.3 for blacks; among women, the national
CABG rate was 16.2 for whites and 6.4 for blacks. Regional differences
in rates of CABG for blacks were limited to non-SMSA (rural) regions.
In multivariate analysis, neither the number of cardiologists nor the
number of admissions for myocardial infarction was associated with CABG
rates for either racial group. However, both location in the Southeast
and the density of thoracic surgeons were significantly associated with
CABG rates for whites (but not for blacks; separate analyses were conducted
for blacks and whites). As a proposed explanation for an association between
surgery rates and physician supply, the authors suggest that physicians
in areas of high concentration may maintain their income by encouraging
patients to have more medical services. This may explain the variation
in racial disparities across states.
The authors consider other possible explanations for the racial differences
in rates of CABG. They rule out the possibility that whites have a greater
need for surgery because the racial difference in hospitalization for
myocardial infarction was smaller than the racial difference in CABG.
Additionally, there was no evident geographic variation in myocardial
infarction rates. (Note that supporting data were not presented. Rates
were presented by state, but formal analyses of potential geographic variation
were not presented.) Other explanations presented include poverty among
blacks, reluctance among blacks to have surgery, physician prejudice,
and lack of Medicare eligibility/co-pay insurance.
This study is limited by its inability to control for individual factors
that might explain geographic variation in rates, but, nonetheless, it
suggests that racial disparities exist in rates of CABG that are not explained
by patient need. The authors conclude that “the discrepancy in the
CABG rates between blacks and whites and the variations in this discrepancy
with sex, region, and availability in physician suggest that social and
cultural factors may interfere with access to care even if a national
health insurance policy is implemented.”