Ford
E, Newman J, Deosaransingh K.
Racial and ethnic differences in the use of cardiovascular procedures:
findings from the California Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.
Am J Public Health 2000;90:1128-34.
This study compared the use of catheterization, percutaneous transluminal
coronary angioplasty (PTCA), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery,
and several noninvasive tests (including multiple-gated acquisition scan,
stress test, and echocardiogram) for whites, African Americans, and Hispanics.
Data from the California Cooperative Cardiovascular Project was used to
identify patients over 65 years of age with confirmed acute myocardial
infarction treated at one of the 383 nonfederal, acute care California
hospitals in 1994 and 1995.
The results indicate that, even after adjusting for various demographic,
medical history, and admission variables related to disease severity,
African Americans were less likely than Whites to have received cardiac
catheterization (29.4% vs. 38.2% respectively), PTCA (12.7% vs. 17.8%),
or CABG surgery (4.6% vs. 9.7%) and more likely to have received a stress
test (16.9% vs. 13.2%) or an echocardiogram (58.6% vs. 53.1%). Hispanic
patients were less likely than whites to have received catheterization
(35.1 vs. 38.2%, respectively) or PTCA (12.1% vs. 17.8%) but not CABG
surgery, an echocardiogram, a stress test, or a multi-gated acquisition
scan. Similar results were obtained when analyses were conducted in subgroups
of patients who were more likely to have been eligible for the various
invasive procedures.
There were several other valuable findings in this study. The authors
examined the mean time to having a procedure and found that the mean time
to having a cardiac catheterization differed significantly among the 3
racial/ethnic groups, with white patients having the shortest time (P<.0001).
The difference in the mean time to having a CABG surgery was nearly significant,
with white patients having the shortest time (P=.0551). The investigators
also assessed rates of patient refusal to selected treatment and found
that refusal rates for catheterization were 1.8% for whites, 1.5% for
African Americans, and 2.3% for Hispanics (P=.554). Thus, the data from
this study document that the “refusal rate for catheterization was
low and did not differ significantly according to race.” The authors
conclude that the data “allowed us to discount but not completely
eliminate differences in disease prevalence, socioeconomic or insurance
status, access to medical care, and the acceptance of cardiac catheterization
[by the patient].”
This carefully designed study discounted several common explanations
offered to explain these racial disparities, including socioeconomic,
insurance status and patient preference differences (in this case differences
in the refusal rate of cardiac catheterization).