Daumit
GL, Hermann JA, Coresh J, Powe NR.
Use of cardiovascular procedures among black persons and white persons:
a 7-year nationwide study in patients with renal disease.
Ann Intern Med 1999;130(3):173-82. (Comment in: Ann Intern Med 1999;130(3):231-3.)
The authors hypothesized that racial differences in use of cardiac procedures
would decrease with acquisition of adequate health insurance (in this
study, Medicare health insurance) when this occurs in conjunction with
development of a serious illness (in this study, end stage renal disease
(ESRD)).
Before the onset of ESRD in the sample patients, there were racial differences
in use of cardiac procedures, even after thoroughly adjusting estimates
for a range of demographic and clinical variables. Major covariates that
partially, but not fully, explained the race effect included insurance
coverage and marital status.
The racial comparison of the use of cardiac procedure use after patients
developed ESRD and acquired Medicare health insurance showed that blacks
had slightly higher use than whites. Since black patients who receive
dialysis survive longer than white patients, the rates of service use
were adjusted for survival time, as well as medical conditions that arose
during the follow-up. This adjustment resulted in white patients being
significantly more likely to use services, but to a lesser degree than
at baseline. The difference at follow-up was largely due to large racial
disparities in service use at baseline and during the first year of follow-up.
The racial differences diminished by the second year and disappeared entirely
during the third year and beyond.
The authors consider why blacks have a higher rate of services at follow-up
(8.5%) than at baseline (2.8%). Change in insurance status may have played
a role, but, since there was a substantial baseline disparity between
black and white patients in both the privately insured and Medicare subgroups,
it seems that acquisition of health insurance could not have been the
only factor leading to the narrowing ethnic gap. The subgroup of patients
that had Medicare coverage at baseline had no change in insurance type
once they received care for ESRD, but the racial difference in procedure
use disappeared with the initiation of comprehensive care for ESRD. The
authors infer that “independent of or through interaction with insurance
status, access to the comprehensive system of health care needed once
ESRD patients undergo dialysis plays a role in increasing the receipt
of cardiovascular procedures among black patients.”
There was no racial difference in service use during the 90-days after
the first hospitalization. “When patients have adequate health insurance,
a regular source of care, and a strong clinical indication for a cardiac
procedures, equity in use of services between black and white patients
can be achieved.”
There was a slightly lower rate of procedures for white patients at follow-up
compared with baseline, suggesting the possibility that reduction in the
use of discretionary procedures for white patients may partially explain
the diminished racial difference in service use over the follow-up.
The authors conclude that “for the general population, health insurance
may be necessary but not sufficient to narrow ethnic gaps in access. Combining
insurance with systems that deliver comprehensive clinically appropriate
care should improve the attainment of equitable access to care.”