Pediatrics
1996 Jan;97(1):26-32
Children's access to primary care: differences by race, income, and
insurance status.
Newacheck PW, Hughes DC, Stoddard JJ.
Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco,
USA.
OBJECTIVE: Congressional initiatives to reduce spending
under major public programs designed to improve access to health care
have brought renewed attention to the health care needs of traditionally
disadvantaged populations. The objective of this study was to assess access
to and use of primary care services for poor, minority, and uninsured
children in the United States.
DESIGN AND SETTING: We analyzed data on 7578 1- to 17-year-old
children of families responding to the 1987 National Medical Expenditure
Survey, a nationally representative sample of families and children.
OUTCOME MEASURES: Adult respondents were asked to report
on several measures of access and use of care for children in the household.
These included the presence of a usual source of care and its characteristics
(type of site, travel time, waiting time, after-hours care, and availability
of a regular physician). We also examined the volume of physician contacts
relative to the sample child's health status, the receipt of measles vaccinations,
and whether children received care in response to selected symptoms of
ill health. Results are presented for children generally and for four
subgroups: poor children; minority children; uninsured children; and white,
non-poor, insured children (the reference group).
RESULTS: Poor, minority, and uninsured children fared
consistently worse than the children in the reference group on all indicators
studied. For example, children in each of the three at-risk groups were
twice as likely as the children in the reference group to lack usual sources
of care, nearly twice as likely to wait 60 minutes or more at their sites
of care, and used only about half as many physician services after adjusting
for health status. Multivariate analyses revealed that poverty, minority
status, and absence of insurance exert independent effects on access to
and use of primary care.
CONCLUSIONS: The existence of substantial barriers to
the access to and use of primary care for low-income, minority, and uninsured
children is cause for significant concern, especially in an era of program
cutbacks. New initiatives are needed to address both financial and non-financial
barriers to the receipt of primary care for disenfranchised children.
PMID: 8545220 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]